![]() ![]() #Adobe captivate vs camtasia softwareIf you need to zoom in to the software screen that you’ve captured, Camtasia is your only choice. If you plan to offer both software demonstrations and written instructions-say, in PDF-the ability to print out Captivate slides is an irresistible timesaver. The situation reverses if you’re creating a quiz, where Captivate offers a much richer toolset. For example, Camtasia excels at capturing streaming video, which Captivate does poorly. On the other hand, if you’re skilled in Macromedia Director or Flash, you’ll find Camtasia a blunt instrument and Captivate more intuitive and precise.īeyond these, however, are certain functions at which one product excels and the other either doesn’t perform or performs poorly. If you’re a video editor, you’ll find Camtasia easy to learn and use, and Captivate unnecessarily complex. On the other hand, if you’re creating interactive demos or training, or a complex software demonstration, Captivate is superior.Įven where they meet in the middle, operating paradigms and interface are so different that they will intuitively appeal to different users. ![]() If you’re creating a quick-and-dirty software demo, or a PowerPoint presentation to post to a Web site, Camtasia is a better tool. Macromedia Captivate by Adobe and TechSmith Camtasia Studio 3.1 are similar software tools with uniquely different strong points. This article originally appeared in the May issue of Streaming Media magazine. Review: Adobe Captivate and TechSmith Camtasia Studio ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |